Cork Andrews is a high profile member of the Creditors’ Committee. Word on the street is that Cork originally said Kevin Padrick was a shyster. Then on another day, Cork changes his mind and votes Kevin Padrick it to take care of all your money.
I find it funny to see that Cork put a lien on a Montana property owned by two of the Summit Principals and 2 innocent parties. This tells me that Cork was trying to position himself first in front of all of you. This also tells me that Kevin Padrick and/or Obsidian should know about this lien if they have done any work on this property.
So now we have Annie Buell and Cork Andrews as Chair and High Profile members of the Creditor’s Committee pushing for Kevin Padrick to be put into the CRO/Trustee role in this case.
Looking back, I don’t see any reason why Kevin Padrick or Obsidian needed to be involved. This could have been handled just fine in its original format with Terry Vance as CRO and actually WORKING on the JOB. My opinion is that Kevin Padrick & Obsidian were simply SELLING HIMSELF for the JOB. They had good allies in Cork Andrews & Annie Buell.
Cork Andrews completely changes his position and gets himself in front of the line. Then Kevin Padrick allows this. I wonder what this is about? Maybe another deal was made at your expense?
It seems to me that Annie Buell acts as a good instigator for Kevin Padrick and maybe there is a deal there too. I hear Annie Buell pushes Jeanette Thomas at Perkins Coie around. Why is Jeanette Thomas being pushed around by Annie Buell??
Seems like individuals who have their own interests in mind are big players in this Bankruptcy Case. Ask yourself why this is the case? Dig Deeper! Find your own Answers? Ask the questions you are scared to ask because you don’t want it to be the Truth. Only then will you be able to see what you need to do to save your money.
THE MONEY IS THERE! It is YOUR HARD EARNED money! The Attorneys look at your money as a game. I don’t think money is a game. It is what we use to pay for our living expenses. We shouldn’t want all of it, but I don’t see why we should be able to PROTECT the money we did earn and is still there. Do you see why you should not get your money back if it is still there if someone just did their job and looked out for your best interest?
r
